Protrieve sheath utilization for capturing supra-filter thrombus during a retrieval of thrombosed and embedded IVC filter.

BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, while effective in preventing pulmonary embolism, can increase the risk of IVC thrombosis. IVC filter (IVCF) thrombosis can result from emboli getting trapped within the filter, extension of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or the device's inherent thrombogenicity causing in situ thrombosis. This condition can cause noticeable clinical symptoms and complicate the removal of the filter due to the potential for thromboembolism, often resulting in temporary filters remaining unextracted. This case report highlights a novel approach employed to mitigate the risk of thromboembolism during the procedure by capturing mobilized thrombus proximally to the entrapped IVCF. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old woman with a complex medical history including cerebral palsy, Crohn's disease, and transfusion-dependent iron-deficiency anemia experienced a pulmonary embolism. Due to failed anticoagulation therapy resulting in gastrointestinal bleeding and high transfusion requirements, she underwent placement of an IVCF as a preventive measure against recurrent pulmonary embolism. Three years later, the patient presented with lower extremity swelling and a sudden decline in hemoglobin levels. Diagnostic imaging revealed adherent nonocclusive thrombus within and above the indwelling IVCF. Utilizing the novel Protrieve sheath with the self-expandable Nitinol funnel, successful endovascular removal of the embedded IVCF and adherent thrombus was performed, while mitigating the risk of intraprocedural pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: The successful intraprocedural trapping and removal of mobilized thrombus from the IVCF removal was achieved using the Protrieve sheath and Nitinol funnel. This approach provides a promising solution to reduce the risk of embolization during the removal of thrombosed IVCFs, potentially outweighing the complications associated with filter removal.

Tanzania IR Initiative: Training the First Generation of Interventional Radiologists.

Despite a population of nearly 60 million, there is currently not a single interventional radiologist in Tanzania. Based on an Interventional Radiology (IR) Readiness Assessment, the key obstacles to establishing IR in Tanzania are the lack of training opportunities and limited availability of disposable equipment. An IR training program was designed and initiated, which relies on US-based volunteer teams of IR physicians, nurses, and technologists to locally train radiology residents, nurses, and technologists. Preliminary results support this strategy for addressing the lack of training opportunities and provide a model for introducing IR to other resource-limited settings.

Image-guided Preoperative Localization of Pulmonary Nodules for Video-assisted and Robotically Assisted Surgery.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotically assisted surgery are used increasingly for minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic resection of pulmonary nodules. Unsuccessful localization of small, impalpable, or deep pulmonary nodules can necessitate conversion from VATS to open thoracotomy. Preoperative localization techniques performed by radiologists have improved the success rates of VATS resection for small and subsolid nodules. Any center at which VATS diagnostic resection of indeterminate pulmonary nodules is performed should be supported by radiologists who offer preoperative nodule localization. Many techniques have been described, including image-guided injection of radioisotopes and radiopaque liquids and placement of metallic wires, coils, and fiducial markers. These markers enable the surgeon to visualize the position of an impalpable nodule intraoperatively. This article provides details on how to perform each percutaneous localization technique, and a group of national experts with established nodule localization programs describe their preferred approaches. Special reference is made to equipment required, optimization of marker placement, prevention of technique-specific complications, and postprocedural treatment. This comprehensive unbiased review provides valuable information for those who are considering implementation or optimization of a nodule localization program according to workflow patterns, surgeon preference, and institutional resources in a particular center. ©RSNA, 2019.

Risk Factors of Infection and Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Placement: Propensity Score Matching.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate risk factors of infection and effectiveness of preprocedural single-dose intravenous prophylactic antibiotic (PABX) during totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) placement in preventing procedure-related infections. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-institution multicenter study evaluating short-term (30-day) infection outcomes after TIVAP placement. Correlation between infection rates and clinical factors, including hematologic versus non-hematologic malignancy, inpatient versus outpatient status, single versus double lumen and PABX, was investigated using univariate and multivariable analysis in the overall study population as well as the propensity-score-matched cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 5967 patients underwent TIVAP placement from 2005 to 2016, of which 3978 (67%) patients received PABX. On propensity score matching, 1952 patients with PABX were matched to the same number of patients without PABX. TIVAP was removed due to infection concern in 48 patients in unmatched and 30 patients in matched population. There was no difference in the rate of infection between those who received PABX and those who did not in both unmatched and matched population (p = 0.5387 and 0.9999). Although infection rate was significantly higher in patients who had TIVAP placement in inpatient setting (p < 0.0001), who received a double-lumen TIVAP (p < 0.0001), or who had hematologic malignancy (p = 0.0004) on univariate analysis, inpatient status was the sole factor associated with higher rate of TIVAP infection on multivariable analysis of both overall (odds ratio 2.31, p < 0.0001) and matched populations (odds ratio 4.36, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: Placement of TIVAP in inpatient setting increases the risk of TIVAP infection. PABX before TIVAP placement does not prevent short-term procedure-related infections.